Why Your Password Complexity Policy Is Making You Less Secure (And What to Do Instead)

Despite clear guidance from leading security standards like NIST SP 800-63B and the OWASP Authentication Cheat Sheet, many websites and enterprise security policies still cling to complexity rules from the early 2000s—while ignoring modern best practices like breach password detection that actually improve security.

What the Security Experts Actually Say

The latest security standards are crystal clear about password complexity:

NIST SP 800-63B states:

"No other complexity requirements for memorized secrets SHOULD be imposed."

"There should be no password composition rules limiting the type of characters permitted. There should be no requirement for upper or lower case or numbers or special characters."

OWASP Authentication Cheat Sheet echoes this guidance, emphasizing length over complexity.

‍

Why Password Complexity Rules Backfire

1. Predictable User Behavior

When you require "uppercase + lowercase + numbers + symbols," users don't create random passwords. They follow predictable patterns:

• password becomes Password1!
• john becomes John123@
• love becomes Love2024#

The problem: These patterns are well-known to attackers. Password cracking tools test these exact transformations first.

2. Users Get Frustrated and Give Up

Complex requirements lead to password fatigue: users either abandon account creation entirely (hurting business growth) or resort to reusing the same "complex" password everywhere to avoid the frustration

3. Counterproductive Workarounds

Complex policies push users toward risky behaviors:

• Writing passwords down insecurely: Sticky notes on monitors, unencrypted phone notes, or email drafts with MyComplex123!@#
• Password reuse across systems: Creating one "super complex" password like MyWork2024!@# and using it everywhere—one breach compromises all accounts
• Predictable incrementing: Spring2024! → Summer2024! → Fall2024!—if attackers get one password, they can predict the next
• Personal info + complexity rules: CompanyName123! or Hometown2024@ using easily researched information from social media

‍

What Actually Works: The Foundation

Focus on Length, Not Complexity

• Minimum 8 characters for user-chosen passwords
• At least 64 characters maximum to support passphrases like "correct horse battery staple is easier to remember than C0rr3ct!"
• Allow ALL characters including unicode, spaces, and emojis 🔒

Note: For higher-security systems, NIST allows longer minimums based on risk assessment.

‍

The Real Security Measures That Matter

A simple 8-character password isn't secure enough on its own. Here's what actually protects users:

Block Breached Passwords

• Use services like "Pwned Passwords" to check against 10+ billion known compromised passwords
• Block common passwords like password123 regardless of complexity
• This stops more attacks than complexity rules ever will

Rate Limiting & Account Protection

• Limit failed attempts (max 100 consecutive failures per NIST)
• Progressive delays (1 second, then 2 seconds, then 4 seconds...)
• Account lockout policies after repeated failures

Password Strength Feedback

• Visual strength meters help users understand what makes passwords strong
• Real-time feedback during password creation

‍

The Game-Changers: Modern Authentication UX

Support Password Managers Properly

Your login forms should:

• Allow pasting into password fields (don't block Ctrl+V!)
• Use standard HTML <input type="password">
• Support Tab navigation between username/password fields
• Avoid custom input widgets that break auto-fill

Why this matters: Password managers enable truly random, unique passwords per site—exactly what security professionals want.

Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA)

Microsoft research shows MFA stops 99.9% of account compromises. Even if passwords are compromised, MFA provides protection.

Passkeys: The Future

Passkeys eliminate passwords entirely, using cryptographic keys tied to your device. They're:

• Impossible to phish
• Unique per site automatically
• No user memory required

The Bottom Line

We understand that for enterprise organizations, adopting these modern best practices requires more work than simply adding "password must contain symbols" to your policy.

But requiring P@ssw0rd123! instead of correct horse battery staple provides only a false sense of security while frustrating users into unsafe behaviors.

The path forward:

1. Remove complexity requirements from your password policies
2. Implement breach password checking and rate limiting
3. Design login forms that work well with password managers
4. Deploy MFA for meaningful protection
5. Plan for passkeys as the long-term solution

Your users—and your security posture—will thank you.

‍

Sources: NIST Special Publication 800-63B "Digital Identity Guidelines" and OWASP Authentication Cheat Sheet

‍